This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of Resolved status.
Section: 32.5.4 [thread.condition.condvarany] Status: Resolved Submitter: Pete Becker Opened: 2009-01-07 Last modified: 2016-02-10
Priority: Not Prioritized
View all other issues in [thread.condition.condvarany].
View all issues with Resolved status.
The requirements for the constructor for condition_variable has several error conditions, but the requirements for the constructor for condition_variable_any has none. Is this difference intentional?
[ Summit: ]
Move to open, pass to Howard. If this is intentional, a note may be helpful. If the error conditions are to be copied from condition_variable, this depends on LWG 965.
[ Post Summit Howard adds: ]
The original intention (N2447) was to let the OS return whatever errors it was going to return, and for those to be translated into exceptions, for both condition_variable and condition_variable_any. I have not received any complaints about specific error conditions from vendors on non-POSIX platforms, but such complaints would not surprise me if they surfaced.
[ 2009-10 Santa Cruz: ]
Leave open. Benjamin to provide wording.
[ 2010 Pittsburgh: ]
We don't have throw clauses for condition variables.
This issue may be dependent on LWG 1268.
Leave open. Detlef will coordinate with Benjamin.
Consider merging LWG 964, 966, and 1268 into a single paper.
Resolved 2011-03 Madrid meeting by paper N3278