This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of NAD status.
Section: 20 [library] Status: NAD Submitter: Niels Dekker Opened: 2008-12-18 Last modified: 2017-02-03
Priority: Not Prioritized
View all other issues in [library].
View all issues with NAD status.
The assignment and equality operators = and == are easily confused, just because of their visual similarity, and in this case a simple typo can cause a serious bug. When the left side of an operator= is an rvalue, it's highly unlikely that the assignment was intended by the programmer:
if ( func() = value ) // Typical typo: == intended!
Built-in types don't support assignment to an rvalue, but unfortunately, a lot of types provided by the Standard Library do.
Fortunately the language now offers a syntax to prevent a certain member function from having an rvalue as *this: by adding a ref-qualifier (&) to the member function declaration. Assignment operators are explicitly mentioned as a use case of ref-qualifiers, in "Extending Move Semantics To *this (Revision 1)", N1821 by Daveed Vandevoorde and Bronek Kozicki
Hereby I would like to propose adding ref-qualifiers to all appropriate assignment operators in the library.
[ Batavia (2009-05): ]
Move to Open. We recommend this be deferred until after the next Committee Draft.
[ Frankfurt 2009-07: ]
The LWG declined to move forward with N2819.
Moved to NAD.
A proposed resolution is provided by the paper on this subject, N2819, Ref-qualifiers for assignment operators of the Standard Library