This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of NAD status.
Section: 18.104.22.168.5 [unique.ptr.single.modifiers] Status: NAD Submitter: Alisdair Meredith Opened: 2008-11-27 Last modified: 2018-06-23
Priority: Not Prioritized
View all other issues in [unique.ptr.single.modifiers].
View all issues with NAD status.
If we are supporting stateful deleters, we need an overload for reset that takes a deleter as well.
void reset(pointer p, deleter_type d);
We probably need two overloads to support move-only deleters, and this sounds uncomfortably like the two constructors I have been ignoring for now...
[ Batavia (2009-05): ]
Howard comments that we have the functionality via move-assigment.
Move to Open.
[ 2009-10 Santa Cruz: ]
Mark as NAD Future.
[2017-02 in Kona, LEWG recommends NAD]
Pointer-accepting overloads of reset() are discouraged — the same functionality is available via move-assignment and that is more idiomatic.
[2017-06-02 Issues Telecon]
Resolve as NAD