This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of Resolved status.
Section: 184.108.40.206 [syserr.errcode.overview], 220.127.116.11 [util.smartptr.shared.io], 99 [facets.examples], 19.9.4 [bitset.operators], 25.4.6 [complex.ops], 28.6 [stream.buffers], 29.9 [re.submatch] Status: Resolved Submitter: Alisdair Meredith Opened: 2008-04-10 Last modified: 2017-03-22
Priority: Not Prioritized
View all other issues in [syserr.errcode.overview].
View all issues with Resolved status.
Addresses UK 220
Should the following use rvalues references to stream in insert/extract operators?
[ Sophia Antipolis ]
Agree with the idea in the issue, Alisdair to provide wording.
[ Daniel adds 2009-02-14: ]
The proposal given in the paper N2831 apparently resolves this issue.
[ Batavia (2009-05): ]
The cited paper is an earlier version of N2844, which changed the rvalue reference binding rules. That paper includes generic templates operator<< and operator>> that adapt rvalue streams.
We therefore agree with Daniel's observation. Move to