This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of Resolved status.
allocator::address
Section: 16.4.4.6 [allocator.requirements] Status: Resolved Submitter: Howard Hinnant Opened: 2007-02-08 Last modified: 2016-01-28
Priority: Not Prioritized
View other active issues in [allocator.requirements].
View all other issues in [allocator.requirements].
View all issues with Resolved status.
Discussion:
The table of allocator requirements in 16.4.4.6 [allocator.requirements] describes
allocator::address
as:
a.address(r) a.address(s)
where r
and s
are described as:
a value of type
X::reference
obtained by the expression*p
.
and p
is
a value of type
X::pointer
, obtained by callinga1.allocate
, wherea1 == a
This all implies that to get the address of some value of type T
that
value must have been allocated by this allocator or a copy of it.
However sometimes container code needs to compare the address of an external value of
type T
with an internal value. For example list::remove(const T& t)
may want to compare the address of the external value t
with that of a value
stored within the list. Similarly vector
or deque insert
may
want to make similar comparisons (to check for self-referencing calls).
Mandating that allocator::address
can only be called for values which the
allocator allocated seems overly restrictive.
[ post San Francisco: ]
Pablo recommends NAD Editorial, solved by N2768.
[ 2009-04-28 Pablo adds: ]
Tentatively-ready NAD Editorial as fixed by N2768.
[ 2009-07 Frankfurt ]
Fixed by N2768.
[ 2009-07-28 Reopened by Alisdair. No longer solved by concepts. ]
[ 2009-10 Santa Cruz: ]
NAD EditorialResolved. Addressed by N2982.
Proposed resolution:
Change 16.4.4.6 [allocator.requirements]:
r
: a value of typeX::reference
obtained by the expression *p.
s
: a value of typeX::const_reference
obtained by the expression.*q
or by conversion from a valuer
[ post Oxford: This would be rendered NAD Editorial by acceptance of N2257. ]
[ Kona (2007): This issue is section 8 of N2387. There was some discussion of it but no resolution to this issue was recorded. Moved to Open. ]