This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of TC1 status.
Section: 126.96.36.199 [basic.ios.cons] Status: TC1 Submitter: Matt Austern Opened: 1998-06-23 Last modified: 2016-02-10
Priority: Not Prioritized
View all other issues in [basic.ios.cons].
View all issues with TC1 status.
There's nothing in 27.4.4 saying what basic_ios's destructor does. The important question is whether basic_ios::~basic_ios() destroys rdbuf().
Add after 188.8.131.52 [basic.ios.cons] paragraph 2:
Notes: The destructor does not destroy rdbuf().
The LWG reviewed the additional question of whether or not rdbuf(0) may set badbit. The answer is clearly yes; it may be set via clear(). See 184.108.40.206 [basic.ios.members], paragraph 6. This issue was reviewed at length by the LWG, which removed from the original proposed resolution a footnote which incorrectly said "rdbuf(0) does not set badbit".