This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of Resolved status.
Section: 22.3 [pairs], 22.4 [tuple] Status: Resolved Submitter: Andrew Koenig Opened: 2004-09-14 Last modified: 2016-01-28
Priority: Not Prioritized
View all other issues in [pairs].
View all issues with Resolved status.
Discussion:
(Based on recent comp.std.c++ discussion)
Pair (and tuple) should specialize std::swap to work in terms of std::swap on their components. For example, there's no obvious reason why swapping two objects of type pair<vector<int>, list<double> > should not take O(1).
[Lillehammer: We agree it should be swappable. Howard will provide wording.]
[
Post Oxford: We got swap for pair but accidently
missed tuple. tuple::swap is being tracked by 522(i).
]
Proposed resolution:
Wording provided in N1856.
Rationale:
Recommend NADResolved, fixed by
N1856.