This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of New status.
Section: 31.12.13.2 [fs.op.absolute] Status: New Submitter: Jonathan Wakely Opened: 2025-06-16 Last modified: 2025-10-14
Priority: 4
View all issues with New status.
Discussion:
[fs.op.absolute] has a note giving strong encouragement, which should be normative:
[Note 3: Implementations are strongly encouraged to not query secondary storage, and not consider
!exists(p)an error. — end note]
The part about !exists(p) not being an error could definitely be a Recommended practice paragraph.
Referring to "secondary storage" might need to be phrased differently to be normative (maybe with a note
clarifying that the normative wording is referring to "secondary storage").
[2025-10-14; Reflector poll]
Set priority to 4 after reflector poll.
Could the !exists(p) part be implementation-defined?
Proposed resolution: