This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of WP status.
possibly-const-range
should prefer returning const R&
Section: 25.2 [ranges.syn] Status: WP Submitter: Hewill Kang Opened: 2023-12-17 Last modified: 2024-11-28
Priority: 2
View all other issues in [ranges.syn].
View all issues with WP status.
Discussion:
possibly-const-range
currently only returns const R&
when R
does not
satisfy constant_range
and const R
satisfies constant_range
.
std::cbegin
(demo):
#include <ranges>
int main() {
auto r = std::views::single(0)
| std::views::transform([](int) { return 0; });
using C1 = decltype(std::ranges::cbegin(r));
using C2 = decltype(std::cbegin(r));
static_assert(std::same_as<C1, C2>); // failed
}
Since R
itself is constant_range
, so possibly-const-range
, above just returns
R&
and C1
is transform_view::iterator<false>
; std::cbegin
specifies to return as_const(r).begin()
, which makes that C2
is
transform_view::iterator<true>
which is different from C1
.
const R&
should always be returned if it's a range, regardless of whether const R
or R
is a constant_range
, just as fmt-maybe-const
in format ranges always prefers
const R
over R
.
Although it is theoretically possible for R
to satisfy constant_range
and that const R
is a mutable range, such nonsense range type should not be of interest.
This relaxation of constraints allows for maximum consistency with std::cbegin
, and in some cases can
preserve constness to the greatest extent (demo):
#include <ranges>
int main() {
auto r = std::views::single(0) | std::views::lazy_split(0);
(*std::ranges::cbegin(r)).front() = 42; // ok
(*std::cbegin(r)).front() = 42; // not ok
}
Above, *std::ranges::cbegin
returns a range of type const lazy_split_view::outer-iterator<false>::value_type
,
which does not satisfy constant_range
because its reference type is int&
.
*std::cbegin(r)
returns lazy_split_view::outer-iterator<true>::value_type
whose reference type is const int&
and satisfies constant_range
.
[2024-03-11; Reflector poll]
Set priority to 2 after reflector poll. Send to SG9.
[St. Louis 2024-06-28; LWG and SG9 joint session: move to Ready]
[Wrocław 2024-11-23; Status changed: Voting → WP.]
Proposed resolution:
This wording is relative to N4971.
Modify 25.2 [ranges.syn], header <ranges>
synopsis, as indicated:
#include <compare> // see 17.11.1 [compare.syn] #include <initializer_list> // see 17.10.2 [initializer.list.syn] #include <iterator> // see 24.2 [iterator.synopsis] namespace std::ranges { […] // 25.7.22 [range.as.const], as const view template<input_range R> constexpr auto& possibly-const-range(R& r) noexcept { // exposition only if constexpr (inputconstant_range<const R>&& !constant_range<R>) { return const_cast<const R&>(r); } else { return r; } } […] }