*This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of New status.*

`operator<=>(tuple, tuple)`

**Section:** 22.4.9 [tuple.rel] **Status:** New
**Submitter:** Corentin Jabot **Opened:** 2022-06-28 **Last modified:** 2022-07-08

**Priority: **4

**View other** active issues in [tuple.rel].

**View all other** issues in [tuple.rel].

**View all issues with** New status.

**Discussion:**

The specification of `operator<=>(tuple, tuple)`

(22.4.9 [tuple.rel]) is described in
terms of imaginary tuples (`t`

, _{tail}`u`

, _{tail}`r`

)
which is a bit confusing. Indeed, It is not clear that these imaginary tuples need to respect the order of
elements of _{tail}`u`

and `t`

, nor whether the value category of the elements in these imaginary
tuples can or should be conserved. It is possible to reformulate and simplify that description so that
no imaginary tuple is involved.

The remark is copied from the similar wording of `operator==`

*[2022-07-08; Reflector poll]*

Set priority to 4 after reflector poll.
Some votes for NAD and preference for the current wording, adding "in order"
to clarify the order of elements in `r`

.
_{tail}

**Proposed resolution:**

This wording is relative to N4910.

Modify 22.4.9 [tuple.rel] as indicated:

template<class... TTypes, class... UTypes> constexpr common_comparison_category_t<

*synth-three-way-result*<TTypes, UTypes>...> operator<=>(const tuple<TTypes...>& t, const tuple<UTypes...>& u);-4-

:~~Effects~~Returns

for the first*synth-three-way*(get<i>(t), get<i>(u))`i`

for which the result of that expression does not compare equal to`0`

. If no such`i`

exists,`strong_ordering::equal`

.~~Performs a lexicographical comparison between~~`t`

and`u`

. For any two zero-length tuples`t`

and`u`

,`t <=> u`

returns`strong_ordering::equal`

. Otherwise, equivalent to:~~if (auto c =~~*synth-three-way*(get<0>(t), get<0>(u)); c != 0) return c; return t_{tail}<=> u_{tail};~~where~~`r`

for some tuple_{tail}`r`

is a tuple containing all but the first element of`r`

.-?-

*Remarks*: The elementary

expressions are evaluated in order from the zeroth index upwards. No element accesses are performed after the first invocation that results in a value that does not compare equal to*synth-three-way*(get<i>(t), get<i>(u))`0`

.~~-5- [~~*Note 1*: The above definition does not require`t`

(or_{tail}`u`

) to be constructed. It might not even be possible, as_{tail}`t`

and`u`

are not required to be copy constructible. Also, all comparison operator functions are short circuited; they do not perform element accesses beyond what is required to determine the result of the comparison. —*end note*]