This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of New status.
lazy_split_view
, CTAD doesn't work when given an input_range
input and a tiny-range
patternSection: 25.7.16.2 [range.lazy.split.view] Status: New Submitter: Konstantin Varlamov Opened: 2022-03-23 Last modified: 2022-05-17
Priority: 3
View other active issues in [range.lazy.split.view].
View all other issues in [range.lazy.split.view].
View all issues with New status.
Discussion:
In lazy_split_view
, the deduction guide that accepts two arbitrary types wraps the arguments in
views::all_t
(25.7.16.2 [range.lazy.split.view]):
template<class R, class P> lazy_split_view(R&&, P&&) -> lazy_split_view<views::all_t<R>, views::all_t<P>>;
When trying to use an input_range
as the input, lazy_split_view
requires the pattern
type to satisfy the exposition-only concept tiny-range
. Trying to use CTAD with an
input_range
and a tiny-range
as arguments results in a compiler error, as demonstrated
in the demo link:
// AssumingInputRange
andTinyRange
are valid types satisfying the // corresponding concepts. std::ranges::lazy_split_view view{InputRange(), TinyRange()}; // Compiler error
The underlying reason is that tiny-range
requires the given type to contain a static member function
size()
that returns a number <=1
(25.7.16.2 [range.lazy.split.view]):
template<class R> concept tiny-range = // exposition only sized_range<R> && requires { typename require-constant<remove_reference_t<R>::size()>; } && (remove_reference_t<R>::size() <= 1);
However, when given a range, views::all_t
wraps the type in a ranges::owning_view
.
owning_view
doesn't satisfy tiny-range
for any template parameter because it
never contains the static size()
function required by the concept.
owning_view
so that it satisfies tiny-range
when the given type is a tiny-range
(that would require moving the tiny-range
concept from 25.7.16.2 [range.lazy.split.view] to 25.5.2 [range.utility.helpers]). A more
localized solution can be to change the deduction guide in lazy_split_view
to avoid wrapping
a type satisfying tiny-range
in views::all_t
.
[2022-05-17; Reflector poll]
Set priority to 3 after reflector poll. One vote for NAD.
Proposed resolution:
This wording is relative to N4910.
Modify 25.5.2 [range.utility.helpers] as indicated:
[Drafting note: This change effectively just moves the definitions of
require-constant
andtiny-range
from 25.7.16.2 [range.lazy.split.view] to 25.5.2 [range.utility.helpers].]
[…] template<class T, class U> concept different-from = // exposition only !same_as<remove_cvref_t<T>, remove_cvref_t<U>>; template<auto> struct require-constant; // exposition only template<class R> concept tiny-range = // exposition only sized_range<R> && requires { typename require-constant<remove_reference_t<R>::size()>; } && (remove_reference_t<R>::size() <= 1);
Modify 25.7.6.3 [range.owning.view], class template owning_view
synopsis, as indicated:
[…] constexpr static auto size() requires tiny-range<R> { return R::size(); } constexpr auto size() requires sized_range<R> { return ranges::size(r_); } constexpr auto size() const requires sized_range<const R> { return ranges::size(r_); } […]
Modify 25.7.16.2 [range.lazy.split.view], class template lazy_split_view
synopsis, as indicated:
[Drafting note: This change effectively just moves the definitions of
require-constant
andtiny-range
from 25.7.16.2 [range.lazy.split.view] to 25.5.2 [range.utility.helpers].]
namespace std::ranges {template<auto> struct require-constant; // exposition only template<class R> concept tiny-range = // exposition only sized_range<R> && requires { typename require-constant<remove_reference_t<R>::size()>; } && (remove_reference_t<R>::size() <= 1);template<input_range V, forward_range Pattern> requires view<V> && view<Pattern> && indirectly_comparable<iterator_t<V>, iterator_t<Pattern>, ranges::equal_to> && (forward_range<V> || tiny-range<Pattern>) class lazy_split_view : public view_interface<lazy_split_view<V, Pattern>> { […] }; […] }