This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of New status.
operator==
to format_to_n_result
Section: 28.5.1 [format.syn] Status: New Submitter: Mark de Wever Opened: 2021-11-14 Last modified: 2022-01-30
Priority: 3
View other active issues in [format.syn].
View all other issues in [format.syn].
View all issues with New status.
Discussion:
During the 2019 Cologne meeting the papers P1614R2 "The Mothership has
Landed" and P0645R10 "Text Formatting" have been accepted. P1614R2 adds
operator==
to to_chars_result
and from_chars_result
. P0645R10
adds a similar type format_to_n_result
without an operator==
.
LWG 3373(i) reaffirms these three types are similar by ensuring they can be used in
structured bindings.
operator==
wasn't applied to format_to_n_result
. I propose to add
operator==
to format_to_n_result
to keep these types similar.
The Out
template argument of format_to_n_result
is unconstrained. Since
it's returned from format_to_n
it's indirectly constrained to an
output_iterator
. An output_iterator
doesn't require equality_comparable
,
thus the defaulted operator==
can be defined deleted.
[2022-01-30; Reflector poll]
Set priority to 3 after reflector poll.
Several votes for NAD. Unclear why to_chars_result
is equality
comparable, but whatever the reason, this is unrelated to them and doesn't
need to be.
Proposed resolution:
This wording is relative to N4901.
Modify 28.5.1 [format.syn], header <format>
synopsis, as indicated:
[…] template<class Out> struct format_to_n_result { Out out; iter_difference_t<Out> size; friend bool operator==(const format_to_n_result&, const format_to_n_result&) = default; }; […]