This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of C++23 status.
contiguous_iterator
should not be allowed to have custom iter_move
and iter_swap
behaviorSection: 24.3.4.14 [iterator.concept.contiguous] Status: C++23 Submitter: Tim Song Opened: 2021-09-28 Last modified: 2023-11-22
Priority: Not Prioritized
View all other issues in [iterator.concept.contiguous].
View all issues with C++23 status.
Discussion:
The iter_move
and iter_swap
customization points were introduced
primarily for proxy iterators. Whatever their application to non-proxy
iterators in general, they should not be allowed to have custom
behavior for contiguous iterators — this new iterator category was
introduced in large part to permit better optimizations, and allowing
custom iter_move/iter_swap
prevents such optimizations for a wide
variety of algorithms that are specified to call them.
[2021-10-14; Reflector poll]
Set status to Tentatively Ready after seven votes in favour during reflector poll.
[2022-02-10 Approved at February 2022 virtual plenary. Status changed: Tentatively Ready → WP.]
Proposed resolution:
This wording is relative to N4892.
Modify 24.3.4.14 [iterator.concept.contiguous] as indicated:
template<class I> concept contiguous_iterator = random_access_iterator<I> && derived_from<ITER_CONCEPT(I), contiguous_iterator_tag> && is_lvalue_reference_v<iter_reference_t<I>> && same_as<iter_value_t<I>, remove_cvref_t<iter_reference_t<I>>> && requires(const I& i) { { to_address(i) } -> same_as<add_pointer_t<iter_reference_t<I>>>; };-2- Let
a
andb
be dereferenceable iterators andc
be a non-dereferenceable iterator of typeI
such thatb
is reachable froma
andc
is reachable fromb
, and letD
beiter_difference_t<I>
. The typeI
modelscontiguous_iterator
only if
(2.1) —
to_address(a) == addressof(*a)
,(2.2) —
to_address(b) == to_address(a) + D(b - a)
,and(2.3) —
to_address(c) == to_address(a) + D(c - a)
.,(2.?) —
ranges::iter_move(a)
has the same type, value category, and effects asstd::move(*a)
, and(2.?) — if
ranges::iter_swap(a, b)
is well-formed, it has effects equivalent toranges::swap(*a, *b)
.