This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of New status.
Section: 16.4.5.11 [res.on.requirements] Status: New Submitter: Tim Song Opened: 2020-04-07 Last modified: 2020-09-06
Priority: 3
View other active issues in [res.on.requirements].
View all other issues in [res.on.requirements].
View all issues with New status.
Discussion:
It has been pointed out both on the LWG reflector and as editorial issue 3912 that the definition of "models" added in P2101R0 is not a model of clarity when a concept is defined in terms of other concepts.
[2020-04-25 Issue Prioritization]
Priority to 3 after reflector discussion. There was a temptation to resolve this as P0, but concerns were expressed that the "satisfied as part of the satisfaction" part was a bit confusing.
Proposed resolution:
This wording is relative to N4861.
Modify 16.4.5.11 [res.on.requirements] as indicated:
-1- A sequence
Args
of template arguments is said to model a conceptC
if:
(1.1) —
Args
satisfiesC
(13.5.3 [temp.constr.decl]);(1.2) —
andArgs
meets all semantic requirements (if any) given in the specification ofC
; and(1.3) — every concept found to be satisfied as part of the satisfaction determination above is also modeled.