This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of New status.
basic_regex
range constructor: Missing requirements for iterator typesSection: 28.6.7.2 [re.regex.construct] Status: New Submitter: Денис Захаров Opened: 2019-11-17 Last modified: 2022-04-22
Priority: 3
View other active issues in [re.regex.construct].
View all other issues in [re.regex.construct].
View all issues with New status.
Discussion:
This is description of a basic_regex
range constructor from N4835,
28.6.7.2 [re.regex.construct]:
template<class ForwardIterator> basic_regex(ForwardIterator first, ForwardIterator last, flag_type f = regex_constants::ECMAScript);-17- Throws:
-18- Effects: Constructs an object of classregex_error
if the sequence[first, last)
is not a valid regular expression.basic_regex
; the object's internal finite state machine is constructed from the regular expression contained in the sequence of characters[first, last)
, and interpreted according to the flags specified inf
. -19- Ensures:flags()
returnsf. mark_count()
returns the number of marked sub-expressions within the expression.
It seems that there are no requirements about dereferenced iterator's element type, that, apparently,
must be implicitly convertible to the basic_regex::value_type
. For example, containers having
range constructor satisfy a SequenceContainer requirements, where implicit converting to its elements
is specified.
[2019-11-30 Issue Prioritization]
Priority to 3 after reflector discussion.
[2021-10-04; Jonathan adds a comment]
There isn't even a requirement that the arguments are iterators.
And assign(InputIterator, InputIterator, flag_type)
is not
constrained to only accept iterators either, meaning you can call it with
two integers and call the
basic_string(size_type, char_type)
constructor.
[2022-04-22; Jonathan adds a comment]
As well as requiring the reference type to be convertible to charT
,
we might want to consider constraining these with forward_iterator
as per P2408.
Proposed resolution: