This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of Resolved status.
operator==
are mis-specifiedSection: 17.11.2 [cmp.categories] Status: Resolved Submitter: Barry Revzin Opened: 2019-09-14 Last modified: 2019-12-29
Priority: 1
View all other issues in [cmp.categories].
View all issues with Resolved status.
Discussion:
All the defaulted operator==
s in 17.11.2 [cmp.categories] are currently specified as:
friend constexpr bool operator==(strong_ordering v, strong_ordering w) noexcept = default;
But the rule for defaulting operator==
requires that the arguments be const&
. All
five should all look like:
friend constexpr bool operator==(const strong_ordering& v, const strong_ordering& w) noexcept = default;
[2019-10-31 Issue Prioritization]
Priority to 1 after reflector discussion.
[2019-11 Wednesday night issue processing - status to Open]
Our preference is for CWG to fix this. JW to provide wording in case CWG cannot.
[Resolved by the adoption of P1946R0 in Belfast]
Proposed resolution: