This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of New status.
Section: 26.2.1 [container.requirements.general] Status: New Submitter: Jonathan Wakely Opened: 2017-10-17 Last modified: 2017-11-22
View other active issues in [container.requirements.general].
View all other issues in [container.requirements.general].
View all issues with New status.
[container.requirements.general] p4 says:
In Tables 83, 84, and 85 X denotes a container class containing objects of type T, a and b denote values of type X, u denotes an identifier, r denotes a non-const value of type X, and rv denotes a non-const rvalue of type X.
This doesn't say anything about whether a and b are allowed to be const, or must be non-const. In fact Table 83 uses them inconsistently, e.g. the rows for "a = rv" and "a.swap(b)" most certainly require them to be non-const, but all other uses are valid for either const or non-const X.
[2017-11 Albuquerque Wednesday night issues processing]
Priority set to 3; Jonathan to provide updated wording.
Wording needs adjustment - could use "possibly const values of type X"
Will distinguish between lvalue/rvalue
This wording is relative to N4687.
Change 26.2.1 [container.requirements.general] p4 as indicated:
-4- In Tables 83, 84, and 85 X denotes a container class containing objects of type T, a and b denote values of type X, u denotes an identifier, r denote
s anon-const value of type X, and rv denotes a non-const rvalue of type X.
Change 26.2.1 [container.requirements.general], Table 83 "Container requirements", as indicated:
Table 83 — Container requirements Expression Return type Operational
Complexity […] a= rv X& All existing elements
aare either move
assigned to or
ashall be equal to
the value that rv had
linear […] a.swap( b) void exchanges the
aand b (Note A) […] swap( a, b) void a.swap( b) (Note A)