This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of New status.
Section: 18.104.22.168 [fpos.operations] Status: New Submitter: Jens Maurer Opened: 2016-11-24 Last modified: 2017-02-02
View other active issues in [fpos.operations].
View all other issues in [fpos.operations].
View all issues with New status.
This is from editorial issue #1031.The first row in Table 112 "Position type requirements" talks about the expression P(i) and then has an assertion p == P(i). However, there are no constraints on p other than being of type P, so (on the face of it) this seems to require that operator== on P always returns true, which is non-sensical.