This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of LEWG status.
Section: 19.6.3 [optional.optional] Status: LEWG Submitter: Richard Smith Opened: 2016-11-24 Last modified: 2017-02-01
View other active issues in [optional.optional].
View all other issues in [optional.optional].
View all issues with LEWG status.
LWG 2756 applies these changes:
constexpr optional(const T&); constexpr optional(T&&);template <class... Args> constexpr explicit optional(in_place_t, Args&&...); template <class U, class... Args> constexpr explicit optional(in_place_t, initializer_list<U>, Args&&...);
These break the ability for optional to perform class template argument deduction, as there is now no way to map from optional's argument to the template parameter T.
[2017-01-30 Ville comments:]
Seems like the problem is resolved by a simple deduction guide:
template <class T> optional(T) -> optional<T>;
The paper p0433r0 seems to suggest a different guide,
template<class T> optional(T&& t) -> optional<remove_reference_t<T>>;
but I don't think the paper is up to speed with LWG 2756. There's no reason to use such an universal reference in the guide and remove_reference in its target, just guide with T, with the target optional<T>, optional's constructors do the right thing once the type has been deduced.