This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of Resolved status.
Section: 19.11.3 [util.smartptr.shared] Status: Resolved Submitter: Marshall Clow Opened: 2016-11-09 Last modified: 2017-02-03
Priority: Not Prioritized
View other active issues in [util.smartptr.shared].
View all other issues in [util.smartptr.shared].
View all issues with Resolved status.
Addresses CA 14
The removal of the "debug only" restriction for use_count() and unique() in shared_ptr introduced a bug: in order for unique() to produce a useful and reliable value, it needs a synchronize clause to ensure that prior accesses through another reference are visible to the successful caller of unique(). Many current implementations use a relaxed load, and do not provide this guarantee, since it's not stated in the Standard. For debug/hint usage that was OK. Without it the specification is unclear and misleading.
Proposed change:A solution could make unique() use memory_order_acquire, and specifying that reference count decrement operations synchronize with unique(). This won't provide sequential consistency but may be useful. We could also specify use_count() as only providing an unreliable hint of the actual count, or deprecate it.
[Issues Telecon 16-Dec-2016]
Resolved by adoption of P0521R0.