This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of NAD status.
std::basic_ostringstream
is missing an allocator-extended constructorSection: 31.8.4 [ostringstream] Status: NAD Submitter: Markus Kemp Opened: 2014-09-03 Last modified: 2017-03-21
Priority: Not Prioritized
View all other issues in [ostringstream].
View all issues with NAD status.
Discussion:
I initially brought this issue up on Stack Overflow, where I was then told to make a topic about this problem on std-discussion, where I was then in turn asked to report the issue.
The problem: Thestd::basic_ostringstream
class template can be instantiated with an allocator type, but none of the
constructors provided accept an allocator argument, which means it's impossible to use std::basic_ostringstream
with
stateful allocators. The C++ Standard Library Defect Report List seems to already mention a similar issue (2210(i)).
[2014-11 Urbana]
Closed as NAD
This is not a rejection of the suggestion, but an observation that simply adding an allocator-aware
constructor is only part of the problem. stringstream
returns the string
assembled
in its buffer by value, as the result of a call to str
, and typically this will not use the
same allocator as would be supplied at construction.
The appropriate way to make progress on this issue, if motivated, is to submit a paper to LEWG addressing the larger design concerns in addition to 'just' adding an (optional) allocator to the constructors.
Proposed resolution: