This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of C++17 status.
std::function
needs more noexcept
Section: 22.10.17.3 [func.wrap.func] Status: C++17 Submitter: Stephan T. Lavavej Opened: 2014-06-14 Last modified: 2017-07-30
Priority: 0
View all other issues in [func.wrap.func].
View all issues with C++17 status.
Discussion:
There are two issues here:
std::function
's constructor from nullptr_t
is marked as noexcept
, but its assignment operator
from nullptr_t
isn't. This assignment can and should be marked as noexcept
.
std::function
's comparisons with nullptr_t
are marked as noexcept
in two out of three places.
[2014-06-16 Rapperswil]
Move to Ready
Proposed resolution:
This wording is relative to N3936.
Change 22.10 [function.objects] p2, header <functional>
synopsis, as indicated:
namespace std { […] // 20.9.11 polymorphic function wrappers: […] template<class R, class... ArgTypes> bool operator==(const function<R(ArgTypes...)>&, nullptr_t) noexcept; template<class R, class... ArgTypes> bool operator==(nullptr_t, const function<R(ArgTypes...)>&) noexcept; template<class R, class... ArgTypes> bool operator!=(const function<R(ArgTypes...)>&, nullptr_t) noexcept; template<class R, class... ArgTypes> bool operator!=(nullptr_t, const function<R(ArgTypes...)>&) noexcept; […] }
Change 22.10.17.3 [func.wrap.func], class template function
synopsis, as indicated:
[…] // 20.9.11.2.1, construct/copy/destroy: […] function& operator=(nullptr_t) noexcept; […]
Change 22.10.17.3.2 [func.wrap.func.con] before p16 as indicated:
function& operator=(nullptr_t) noexcept;