2206. Inaccuracy in initializer_list constructor requirements

Section: 26.2.3 [sequence.reqmts], 26.2.6 [associative.reqmts], 26.2.7 [unord.req], [rand.req.seedseq] Status: Open Submitter: Jeffrey Yasskin Opened: 2012-10-21 Last modified: 2016-02-10

Priority: 3

View other active issues in [sequence.reqmts].

View all other issues in [sequence.reqmts].

View all issues with Open status.


In 26.2.3 [sequence.reqmts] p3, we have "il designates an object of type initializer_list<value_type>", and then several functions that take 'il' as an argument. However, an expression like {1, 2, 'a'} is not an object of type initializer_list<int> unless it's used to initialize an explicitly-typed variable of that type. I believe we want:

std::vector<int> v;
v = {1, 2, 'a'};

to compile portably, so we should say something different when defining 'il'. The same phrasing happens in 26.2.6 [associative.reqmts], 26.2.7 [unord.req], and [rand.req.seedseq].

This may just be an editorial issue because the actual class synopses declare the functions to take initializer_list<exact_type>.

[2013-03-15 Issues Teleconference]

Moved to Open.

This is definitely not NAD

Should copy the suggested wording as the proposed resolution.

Proposed resolution: