This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of NAD status.
shared_future(future<R>&&)
should be allowed to throwSection: 32.10.8 [futures.shared.future] Status: NAD Submitter: Peter Sommerlad Opened: 2011-04-04 Last modified: 2021-06-06
Priority: Not Prioritized
View all other issues in [futures.shared.future].
View all issues with NAD status.
Discussion:
Requiring the constructor shared_future(future<R>&& rhs)
not to throw
is a pessimisation of the case where a future is returned from a call to
async(function,launch::deferred)
and possible other cases.
shared_future
from that future will require more
infrastructure, like space for the value of type R
, an exception_ptr
, and a synchronized
reference counter for the shared_future
's instances.
Enforcing the constructor shared_future(future<R>&& rhs)
not to throw,
implies that any implementation of future
will need to pre-allocate space for shared_future
's
infrastructure, that also requires an operating system resource for synchronization, regardless
if is ever needed.
All this came up when discussing D/N3267 and Concurrency Working Group decided that the constructor
shared_future(future<R>&& rhs)
should be allowed to throw.
[ 2011 Bloomington ]
Closed as NAD. Rationale to follow by email...
Proposed resolution:
Apply the proposed resolution of n3269