This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of Resolved status.
Section: 26.4 [associative] Status: Resolved Submitter: Paolo Carlini Opened: 2010-10-29 Last modified: 2017-02-03
Priority: Not Prioritized
View all other issues in [associative].
View all issues with Resolved status.
I'm seeing something strange in the paragraphs 126.96.36.199 [map.modifiers] and 188.8.131.52 [multimap.modifiers]: they both talk about tuple<const key_type, mapped_type> but I think they should be talking about pair<const key_type, mapped_type> because, among other reasons, a tuple is not convertible to a pair. If I replace tuple with pair everything makes sense to me.The proposed resolution is obvious.
[ 2010-11-07 Daniel comments ]
This is by far not the only necessary fix within both sub-clauses. For details see the 2010-10-29 comment in 2005.
[2011-03-24 Madrid meeting]
Paolo: Don't think we can do it now.Daniel K: Agrees.
[ 2011 Bloomington ]
Consensus that this issue will be resolved by 2005, but held open until that issue is resolved.
Apply the resolution proposed by the 2010-10-29 comment in 2005.