This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of TC1 status.
allocate(0)
return?Section: 16.4.4.6 [allocator.requirements] Status: TC1 Submitter: Matt Austern Opened: 1999-11-19 Last modified: 2016-01-28
Priority: Not Prioritized
View other active issues in [allocator.requirements].
View all other issues in [allocator.requirements].
View all issues with TC1 status.
Discussion:
Suppose that A
is a class that conforms to the
Allocator requirements of Table 32, and a
is an
object of class A
What should be the return
value of a.allocate(0)
? Three reasonable
possibilities: forbid the argument 0
, return
a null pointer, or require that the return value be a
unique non-null pointer.
Proposed resolution:
Add a note to the allocate
row of Table 32:
"[Note: If n == 0
, the return value is unspecified. --end note]"
Rationale:
A key to understanding this issue is that the ultimate use of allocate() is to construct an iterator, and that iterator for zero length sequences must be the container's past-the-end representation. Since this already implies special case code, it would be over-specification to mandate the return value.