This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of Dup status.
gcount()
after a call to gcount
Section: 31.7.5.4 [istream.unformatted] Status: Dup Submitter: Dietmar Kühl Opened: 1999-07-20 Last modified: 2016-01-28
Priority: Not Prioritized
View all other issues in [istream.unformatted].
View all issues with Dup status.
Duplicate of: 60
Discussion:
It is not clear which functions are to be considered unformatted
input functions. As written, it seems that all functions in 31.7.5.4 [istream.unformatted] are unformatted input functions. However, it does not
really make much sense to construct a sentry object for
gcount()
, sync()
, ... Also it is unclear what
happens to the gcount()
if eg. gcount()
,
putback()
, unget()
, or sync()
is called:
These functions don't extract characters, some of them even
"unextract" a character. Should this still be reflected in
gcount()
? Of course, it could be read as if after a call to
gcount()
gcount()
return 0
(the last
unformatted input function, gcount()
, didn't extract any
character) and after a call to putback()
gcount()
returns -1
(the last unformatted input function
putback()
did "extract" back into the
stream). Correspondingly for unget()
. Is this what is
intended? If so, this should be clarified. Otherwise, a corresponding
clarification should be used.
Rationale: