This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of Resolved status.
Section: 29 [atomics] Status: Resolved Submitter: Hans Boehm Opened: 2010-11-13 Last modified: 2016-02-10
Priority: Not Prioritized
View all other issues in [atomics].
View all issues with Resolved status.
Addresses GB-63 for Clause 29
Clause 29 does not specify noexcept for any of the atomic operations. It probably should, though that's not completely clear. In particular, atomics may want to throw in implementations that support transactional memory.
Apply paper N3251, noexcept for the Atomics Library.