Section: 33.6.5 [futures.state] Status: NAD Editorial Submitter: Switzerland Opened: 2010-08-25 Last modified: 2016-02-10
Priority: Not Prioritized
View all other issues in [futures.state].
View all issues with NAD Editorial status.
The term "associated asynchronous state" is long, ugly and misleading terminology. When introduced we agreed upon that we should come up with a better name. Here it is: "liaison state". Since the state is hidden and provides synchronization of a future with its corresponding promise, we believe "liaison state" is a much better and shorter name (liaison ~ (typically hidden) relationship)
[ Resolution proposed by ballot comment: ]
Change all occurrences of "associated asynchronous state" to "liaison state".
The project editor may supply a more appopriate term, or use "liaison state", at his own discretion.