This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of C++11 status.
Section: 188.8.131.52 [array.zero] Status: C++11 Submitter: BSI Opened: 2010-08-25 Last modified: 2016-02-10
Priority: Not Prioritized
View all other issues in [array.zero].
View all issues with C++11 status.
Should the effect of calling front/back on a zero-sized array really be implementation defined i.e. require the implementor to define behaviour?
[ Resolved in Rapperswil by a motion to directly apply the words from the ballot comment in N3102. ]
Change "implementation defined" to "undefined"