This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of C++11 status.
function
does not need an explicit
default constructorSection: 22.10.17.3.2 [func.wrap.func.con] Status: C++11 Submitter: Japan Opened: 2010-08-25 Last modified: 2016-01-28
Priority: Not Prioritized
View all other issues in [func.wrap.func.con].
View all issues with C++11 status.
Discussion:
Addresses JP-4
Really does the function
require that default constructor is explicit
?
[ Resolved in Rapperswil by a motion to directly apply the words from the ballot comment in N3102. ]
Proposed resolution:
Remove explicit
.
function(); template <class A> function(allocator_arg_t, const A& a);