Section: 99 [pair.range] Status: C++11 Submitter: BSI Opened: 2010-08-25 Last modified: 2016-02-10
Priority: Not Prioritized
View all issues with C++11 status.
While std::pair may happen to hold a pair of iterators forming a valid range, this is more likely a coincidence than a feature guaranteed by the semantics of the pair template. A distinct range-type should be supplied to enable the new for-loop syntax rather than overloading an existing type with a different semantic.
If a replacement facility is required for C++0x, consider n2995.
[ Resolved in Rapperswil by a motion to directly apply the words from the ballot comment in N3102. ]
Strike 18.104.22.168 and the matching declarations in 20.3 header synopsis.