This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of Resolved status.
Section: 188.8.131.52.4 [bitmask.types] Status: Resolved Submitter: BSI Opened: 2010-08-25 Last modified: 2016-02-10
Priority: Not Prioritized
View all other issues in [bitmask.types].
View all issues with Resolved status.
The bitmask types defined in 27.5.2 and 28.5 contradict the bitmask type requirements in 184.108.40.206.3, and have missing or incorrectly defined operators.
[ Resolution proposed by ballot comment ]
See Appendix 1 - Additional Details
[ 2010 - Rapperswil ]
The paper n3110 was made available during the meeting to resolve this comment, but withdrawn from formal motions to give others time to review the document. There was no technical objection, and it is expected that this paper will go forward at the next meeting.