Section: 99 [defns.move.ctor] Status: Resolved Submitter: BSI Opened: 2010-08-25 Last modified: 2016-02-10
Priority: Not Prioritized
View all issues with Resolved status.
This definition of move-constructor is redundant and confusing now that the term constructor is defined by the core language in subclause 12.8p3.
[ 2010-10-24 Daniel adds: ]
Accepting n3142 provides a superior resolution.
[ 2010 Batavia: resolved as NAD Editorial by adopting paper n3142. ]
Original proposed resolution preserved for reference:
Strike subclause 17.3.14, [defns.move.ctor]
move constructor a constructor which accepts only an rvalue argument of the type being constructed and might modify the argument as a side effect during construction.
Resolved by paper n3142.