This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of Resolved status.
Section: 184.108.40.206 [unique.ptr.runtime] Status: Resolved Submitter: Daniel Krügler Opened: 2009-12-20 Last modified: 2016-01-28
Priority: Not Prioritized
View all other issues in [unique.ptr.runtime].
View all issues with Resolved status.
Addresses UK 211
As a response to UK 211 LWG issue 1021 has replaced the unspecified-pointer-type by nullptr_t to allow assignment of type-safe null-pointer literals in the non-array form of unique_ptr::operator=, but did not the same for the specialization for arrays of runtime length. But without this parallel change of the signature we have a status quo, where unique_ptr<T, D> declares a member function which is completely unspecified.
[ 2009-12-21 Moved to Tentatively Ready after 5 positive votes on c++std-lib. ]
[ 2010-03-14 Howard adds: ]
We moved N3073 to the formal motions page in Pittsburgh which should obsolete this issue. I've moved this issue to NAD Editorial, solved by N3073.
Solved by N3073.
In 220.127.116.11 [unique.ptr.runtime], class template unique_ptr<T, D> synopsis, change as indicated:
// assignment unique_ptr& operator=(unique_ptr&& u); unique_ptr& operator=(