This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of Resolved status.
Section: 33.10.6 [futures.promise] Status: Resolved Submitter: Jonathan Wakely Opened: 2009-12-18 Last modified: 2016-02-10
Priority: Not Prioritized
View other active issues in [futures.promise].
View all other issues in [futures.promise].
View all issues with Resolved status.
In 33.10.6 [futures.promise]
Does promise<R>::set_value return normally if the copy/move constructor of R throws?
The exception could be caught and set using promise<R>::set_exception, or it could be allowed to leave the set_value call, but it's not clear which is intended. I suggest the exception should not be caught.
N.B. This doesn't apply to promise<R&>::set_value or promise<void>::set_value because they don't construct a new object.
2010 Pittsburgh: Moved to
NAD Editorial. Rationale added below.
Solved by N3058.
Change 33.10.6 [futures.promise]/18:
18 Throws: future_error if its associated state is already ready.