This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of C++11 status.
[u|bi]nary_function specializationSection: 99 [depr.base] Status: C++11 Submitter: Alberto Ganesh Barbati Opened: 2009-11-30 Last modified: 2016-01-28
Priority: Not Prioritized
View all other issues in [depr.base].
View all issues with C++11 status.
Discussion:
A program should not be allowed to add specialization of class templates
unary_function and binary_function, in force of 16.4.5.2.1 [namespace.std]/1.
If a program were allowed to specialize these templates, the library could no
longer rely on them to provide the intended typedefs or there might be other
undesired interactions.
[ 2010-03-27 Daniel adds: ]
Accepting issue 1290(i) would resolve this issue as NAD editorial.
[ 2010-10-24 Daniel adds: ]
Accepting n3145 would resolve this issue as NAD editorial.
[ 2010 Batavia: ]
Pete: Is this issue actually addressed by N3198, or did deprecating unary/binary_function?
We determined that this issue is NOT resolved and that it must be resolved or else N3198 could break code that does specialize unary/binary function. Matt: don't move to NAD Howard: I suggest we go further and move 1279 to ready for Madrid. Group: Agrees move 1279 to ready for Madrid
Previous proposed resolution:
1 The following
classesclass templates are provided to simplify the typedefs of the argument and result types:. A program shall not declare specializations of these templates.
[2011-03-06 Daniel comments]
This meeting outcome was not properly reflected in the proposed resolution. I also adapted the suggested wording to the N3242 numbering and content state. During this course of action it turned out that the first suggested wording change has already been applied.
Proposed resolution:
Change paragraph 99 [depr.base]/1 as follows:
1 The class templates
unary_functionandbinary_functionare deprecated. A program shall not declare specializations of these templates.