This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of Resolved status.
Section: 99 [futures.atomic_future] Status: Resolved Submitter: Jonathan Wakely Opened: 2009-11-22 Last modified: 2017-02-03
Priority: Not Prioritized
View all other issues in [futures.atomic_future].
View all issues with Resolved status.
In 99 [futures.atomic_future] this constructor:
is declared in the synopsis, but not defined. Instead n2997 defines:
atomic_future(const future<R>&& rhs);
and n3000 defines
both of which are wrong. The constructor definition should be changed to match the synopsis.
[ 2009-12-12 Moved to Tentatively Ready after 5 positive votes on c++std-lib. ]
[ 2010 Pittsburgh: ]
NAD Editorial. Rationale added below.
Solved by N3058.
Adjust the signature above 99 [futures.atomic_future]/6 like so: