This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of NAD status.
Section: 18.104.22.168 [meta.unary.prop] Status: NAD Submitter: Alisdair Meredith Opened: 2009-10-07 Last modified: 2016-02-10
Priority: Not Prioritized
View other active issues in [meta.unary.prop].
View all other issues in [meta.unary.prop].
View all issues with NAD status.
According to p1 19.15.2 [meta.type.synop]:
The behavior of a program that adds specializations for any of the class templates defined in this subclause is undefined unless otherwise specified.
I believe we should 'otherwise specify' for the nothrow traits, are these are exactly the use cases where the end user actually has more information than the compiler.
[ 2009-10 Santa Cruz: ]
Moved to Open. Definitely need to give the users the ability to ensure that the traits give the right answers. Unsure we want to give them the ability to say this in more than one way. Believes the noexcept proposal already gives this.
[ 2010 Pittsburgh: Moved to NAD, rationale added below. ]
We believe the solution offered by N3050 is superior.
Add the following comment:
user specialization permitted to derive from std::true_type when the operation is known not to throw.
to the following traits in 22.214.171.124 [meta.unary.prop] Table 43 Type property predicates.
[ This may require a new Comments column ]
has_nothrow_default_constructor has_nothrow_copy_constructor has_nothrow_assign