This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of NAD status.

1091. Multimap description confusing

Section: [multimap.modifiers] Status: NAD Submitter: LWG Opened: 2009-03-22 Last modified: 2016-02-10

Priority: Not Prioritized

View all issues with NAD status.


Addresses UK 246

The content of this sub-clause is purely trying to describe in words the effect of the requires clauses on these operations, now that we have Concepts. As such, the description is more confusing than the signature itself. The semantic for these functions is adequately covered in the requirements tables in 21.2.6 [associative.reqmts].

[ Beman adds: ]

Pete is clearly right that this one is technical rather than editorial.

[ Batavia (2009-05): ]

We agree with the proposed resolution.

Move to Review.

[ 2009-10 Santa Cruz: ]

Mark as NAD, solved by removing concepts.

Proposed resolution:

Strike [multimap.modifiers] entirely (but do NOT strike these signatures from the class template definition!).