This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of Resolved status.
Section: 32.9.10 [futures.task] Status: Resolved Submitter: Daniel Krügler Opened: 2009-03-22 Last modified: 2016-02-10
Priority: Not Prioritized
View all other issues in [futures.task].
View all issues with Resolved status.
Class template packaged_task in 32.9.10 [futures.task] shows a member swap declaration, but misses to document it's effects (No prototype provided). Further on this class misses to provide a non-member swap.
[ Batavia (2009-05): ]
Alisdair notes that paragraph 2 of the proposed resolution has already been applied in the current Working Draft.
We note a pending future-related paper by Detlef; we would like to wait for this paper before proceeding.
Move to Open.
[ 2009-05-24 Daniel removed part 2 of the proposed resolution. ]
[ 2009-10 post-Santa Cruz: ]
Move to Tentatively Ready, removing bullet 3 from the proposed resolution but keeping the other two bullets.
[ 2010 Pittsburgh: ]
NAD Editorial. Rationale added below.
Solved by N3058.
In 32.9.10 [futures.task], immediately after the definition of class template packaged_task add:
At the end of 32.9.10 [futures.task] (after p. 20), add the following prototype description: