This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of Resolved status.
Section: 32.9.6 [futures.promise] Status: Resolved Submitter: Alisdair Meredith Opened: 2009-03-12 Last modified: 2016-02-10
Priority: Not Prioritized
View other active issues in [futures.promise].
View all other issues in [futures.promise].
View all issues with Resolved status.
Addresses UK 339 [CD1]
Move assignment is going in the wrong direction, assigning from *this to the passed rvalue, and then returning a reference to an unusable *this.
[ Summit: ]
Agree, move to Review.
[ Batavia (2009-05): ]
We recommend deferring this issue until after Detlef's paper (on futures) has been issued.
[ 2009-10 Santa Cruz: ]
NAD Editorial. Addressed by N2997.
Strike 32.9.6 [futures.promise] p6 and change p7:
promise& operator=(promise&& rhs);
-6- Effects: move assigns its associated state to rhs.
*this has no associated state.