This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of NAD Concepts status.
Section: 26.6.10 [alg.adjacent.find] Status: NAD Concepts Submitter: Chris Jefferson Opened: 2009-03-09 Last modified: 2016-01-28
Priority: Not Prioritized
View all other issues in [alg.adjacent.find].
View all issues with NAD Concepts status.
Discussion:
Addresses UK 296
adjacent_find
in C++03 allows an arbitrary predicate, but in C++0x
EqualityComparable/EquivalenceRelation
is required. This forbids a
number of use cases, including:
adjacent_find(begin, end, less<double>)
Find the first place where a range is not ordered in decreasing order - in use to check for sorted ranges. adjacent_find(begin, end, DistanceBiggerThan(6) ) )
Find the first place in a range where values differ by more than a given value - in use to check an algorithm which produces points in space does not generate points too far apart.
A number of books use predicate which are not equivalence relations in examples, including "Thinking in C++" and "C++ Primer".
Adding the requirement that the predicate is an EquivalenceRelation
does not appear to open up any possibility for a more optimised algorithm.
Proposed resolution:
Change the definition of adjacent_find in the synopsis of 26 [algorithms] and 26.6.10 [alg.adjacent.find] to:
template<ForwardIterator Iter> requiresEqualityComparableHasEqualTo<Iter::value_type, Iter::value_type> Iter adjacent_find(Iter first, Iter last); template<ForwardIterator Iter,EquivalenceRelationPredicate<auto, Iter::value_type, Iter::value_type> Pred> requires CopyConstructible<Pred> Iter adjacent_find(Iter first, Iter last, Pred pred);