This is an unofficial snapshot of the ISO/IEC JTC1 SC22 WG21 Core Issues List revision 118e. See http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/ for the official list.
2025-11-05
(From submission #521.)
Consider:
namespace N
{
template<typename T>
struct A;
}
template<>
struct N::A<int>; // #1
template<typename T>
struct N::A<T*>; // #2
#1 is currently well-formed, but #2 is an ill-formed use of an elaborated-type-specifier. This is inconsistent and not aligned with implementation practice.
Suggested resolution:
Change in 9.2.9.5 [dcl.type.elab] paragraph 2 as follows:
If an elaborated-type-specifier is the sole constituent of a declaration, the declaration is ill-formed unless it is an explicit specialization (13.9.4 [temp.expl.spec]), a partial specialization (13.7.6 [temp.spec.partial]), an explicit instantiation (13.9.3 [temp.explicit]) or it has one of the following forms: ...
CWG 2024-05-17
Duplicate of issue 2874.