This is an unofficial snapshot of the ISO/IEC JTC1 SC22 WG21 Core Issues List revision 114a. See http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/ for the official list.
2024-04-18
[Accepted as a DR at the June, 2021 meeting.]
There are several places where the consteval and/or constinit keywords should be mentioned but are not:
6.9.3.1 [basic.start.main] paragraph 3:
A program that defines main as deleted or that declares main to be inline, static, or constexpr is ill-formed.
9.3.4.1 [dcl.meaning.general] paragraph 2:
A static, thread_local, extern, mutable, friend, inline, virtual, constexpr, or typedef specifier or an explicit-specifier applies directly to each declarator-id in an init-declarator-list or member-declarator-list...
11.4.5.1 [class.ctor.general] paragraph 1:
...In a constructor declaration, each decl-specifier in the optional decl-specifier-seq shall be friend, inline, constexpr, or an explicit-specifier.
Proposed resolution, May, 2021:
Change 6.9.3.1 [basic.start.main] paragraph 3 as follows:
...A program that defines main as deleted or that declares main to be inline, static,orconstexpr, or consteval is ill-formed...
Change 9.3.4.1 [dcl.meaning.general] paragraph 4 as follows:
A static, thread_local, extern, mutable, friend, inline, virtual, constexpr, consteval, constinit, or typedef specifier or an explicit-specifier applies directly to each declarator-id in a declaration; the type specified for each declarator-id depends on both the decl-specifier-seq and its declarator.
Change 11.4.5.1 [class.ctor.general] paragraph 5 as follows:
...Constructors do not have names. In a constructor declaration, each decl-specifier in the optional decl-specifier-seq shall be friend, inline, constexpr, consteval, or an explicit-specifier.