This is an unofficial snapshot of the ISO/IEC JTC1 SC22 WG21 Core Issues List revision 118e. See http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/ for the official list.
2025-11-05
[Voted into the WP at the July, 2017 meeting.]
In an example like:
struct A {
A(int, int = 0);
void f(int, int = 0);
};
struct B : A {
B(int); using A::A;
void f(int); using A::f;
}
calls to B(int) and B::f(int) are ambiguous, because they could equally call the version inherited from the base class. This doesn't match the intent in 9.10 [namespace.udecl], which usually makes derived-class functions take precedence over ones from a base class.
The above patterns are not common, although they sometimes cause breakage when refactoring a base class. However, P0136R1 brings this into sharp focus, because it causes the rejection of the following formerly-valid and very reasonable code:
struct A {
A(int = 0);
};
struct B : A {
using B::B;
};
B b;
Proposed resolution (May, 2017):
This issue is resolved by the resolution of issue 2273.