This is an unofficial snapshot of the ISO/IEC JTC1 SC22 WG21 Core Issues List revision 115d. See http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/ for the official list.
2024-10-26
It is not clear what should happen for an example like:
template<typename T> struct A { class B { class C {}; }; }; class X { static int x; template <typename T> friend class A<T>::B::C; }; template<> struct A<int> { typedef struct Q B; }; struct Q { class C { int f() { return X::x; } }; };
It appears that the friend template matches Q::C, because that class is also A<int>::B::C, but neither GCC nor EDG allow this code (saying X::x is inaccessible). (Clang doesn't support friend template declarations with a dependent scope.)
A strict reading of 13.7.5 [temp.friend] paragraph 5 might suggest that the friend declaration itself is ill-formed, because it does not declare a member of a class template, but I can't find any compiler that implements template friends that way.
Additional note (January, 2024)
The example is ill-formed per the resolution of issue 1862 (adopted in November, 2017).