This is an unofficial snapshot of the ISO/IEC JTC1 SC22 WG21 Core Issues List revision 112e. See http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/ for the official list.
[Moved to DR at the February, 2014 meeting.]
The grammar for elaborated-type-specifier in 184.108.40.206 [dcl.type.elab] reads, in part,
This allows use of the template keyword without a nested-name-specifier, e.g., struct template S<int>. This is inconsistent with other uses of the template keyword. It might be better to split the production in two and only allow the keyword following a nested-name-specifier, i.e.,
Proposed resolution (January, 2014):
Change the grammar in 220.127.116.11 [dcl.type.elab] as follows: