This is an unofficial snapshot of the ISO/IEC JTC1 SC22 WG21 Core Issues List revision 115e. See http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/ for the official list.
2024-11-11
[Moved to DR at the April, 2013 meeting.]
There is a contradiction in the specification of the linkage of members of the unnamed namespace, for example
namespace {
int x;
}
According to 6.6 [basic.link] paragraph 4,
An unnamed namespace or a namespace declared directly or indirectly within an unnamed namespace has internal linkage. All other namespaces have external linkage. A name having namespace scope that has not been given internal linkage above has the same linkage as the enclosing namespace if it is the name of
a variable; or
...
which would give x internal linkage. However, 9.2.2 [dcl.stc] paragraph 7 says,
A name declared in a namespace scope without a storage-class-specifier has external linkage unless it has internal linkage because of a previous declaration and provided it is not declared const.
This would give x external linkage. (This appears to have been a missed edit from the resolution of issue 1113.)
Proposed resolution (October, 2012):
Delete 9.2.2 [dcl.stc] paragraph 7:
A name declared in a namespace scope without a storage-class-specifier has external linkage unless it has internal linkage because of a previous declaration and provided it is not declared const. Objects declared const and not explicitly declared extern have internal linkage.