This is an unofficial snapshot of the ISO/IEC JTC1 SC22 WG21 Core Issues List revision 115d. See http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/ for the official list.
2024-10-26
[Voted into the WP at the March, 2011 meeting as part of paper N3262.]
Now that alignment can be applied directly to class types, the current wording of the note at the end of 6.7.6 [basic.align] paragraph 3 is no longer correct:
[Note: every over-aligned type is or contains a class type with a non-static data member to which an extended alignment has been applied. —end note]
Proposed resolution (November, 2010) [SUPERSEDED]:
Change 6.7.6 [basic.align] paragraph 3 as follows:
[Note: every over-aligned type isor containsa class typewith a non-static data member to which an extended alignment has been appliedto which extended alignment applies (possibly through a non-static data member). —end note]